Steel wall Egypt in the eyes of international law - مقالاتي - كاتالوج المقالات

Steel wall Egypt in the eyes of international law

Steel wall Egypt in the eyes of international law Steel wall Egypt in the eyes of international law Americans and Israelis confirmed at least that Egypt comprehensive evaluated with the help of the American side wall length of several kilometers and a depth of 18 meters and steel. From the Egyptian side has not been confirmed explicitly and implicitly but make sure, and the reasons for the construction of the wall as elaborated Egyptians are preventing smuggling between Egypt and Gaza. The right of Egypt in the construction of the wall within its territory has explained the Foreign Minister stressed that it is a sovereign decision back to Egypt and its national security. I would like in this article to discuss these words quietly and purely legal point of view. It is the right of any state to do what they want within their borders to secure itself from its neighbors, but longstanding rule of international law is that the right of this state restricted the obligation not to harm illegal neighboring state or territory next door. In an analysis from the wall will blamed entirely statements and descriptions are fired from Egypt or towards Egypt on Arab solidarity, or that Palestine in the liver of every Egyptian or Palestinian Muslims and must save them, because they are descriptions no longer touches the reality, but provoke the reader, but I focus only on the right of Egypt, who confirmed in her speech that Baan done so far on the wall. When it comes to Gaza, which is bounded north sea besieged, and along its eastern border and southern Israel that carry legitimate Zionist goal the elimination of the Palestinian people and internship Permanent Gaza and declared a territory hostile allow it all prohibited under international law, the western border of Gaza, Egypt is becoming the focus of hope Psychologically, not only to save Gaza from the Zionist monster, but to supply Gaza with all the necessary necessities of survival, which in normal circumstances the question if improved economic intentions, a source of profit for the Egyptian side. But for many reasons do not need to Aqahamha in this context considers Egypt to establish a buffer solid between these 'enemies' who are waiting for their constituencies and change them from time to time and cause them embarrassment with Israel, and Egypt think that this decision comes from a sense of Egyptian pure without dictating from a this risks. But on the other side, it what international law was considered Strip as occupied territory and that its blockade, of crimes against humanity, and genocide of its population, as well as being war crimes under the Fourth Geneva Convention, has enjoined international law states parties treaties that criminalize this work should seek to break this siege and rescue the population and ensure a minimum of humanitarian conditions for their survival. As for Egypt, and because of its status as a single port on the other side of the Strip has arranged international law obligations harshest They need to open the Rafah crossing and all other border ports to save Gaza from Israeli scheme genocide. The provisions of the embargo by closing the crossing and refused to pass the supplies necessary, has led to the establishment of tunnels which outlets to escape from this scheme, so close is the other, and prevent air from passing into Gaza through a steel wall mastered Israel and the United States in its industry to convey Israel's border with Gaza east and replace Egypt's border with Gaza to the west in the hands of Egyptian and Egyptian security, it is work - away from emotional descriptions that no longer make sense with Egypt official serious at this stage of the life of Egypt - makes the construction of the wall vehicle crime par excellence. The stated goal is to persist in strangling the people of Gaza, and punished for guilt Ertkpoh and scare them to death to meet their attachment system loved him or hated him, they have chosen or imposed on them no one interfere with it whatever his opinion it politically. The political goal has no value because the law relies on criminal intent is the extermination of the population regardless of the motives. The wall itself means that Egypt abandoned its international legal obligations for the benefit of the besieged people of Gaza, and collaborated with Israel to tighten the crime. The professor has already Richard Falk, the Council of the United Nations human rights of the occupied territories that pointed out in his report on the Gaza holocaust to the crime of depriving the people of Gaza from the right to escape from destruction, let alone that the wall makes doom investigators and removes all possibility to achieve it. Egypt's engagement with Israel and the United States in the extermination of the population of Gaza whatever justifications have all these parties puts Egypt just in the circle of criminality, not to mention that this review is compliance Egyptian-Israeli agreement previously Egypt that was considered a blatant interference in its affairs and was angry because he performs on its territory without participation, and it seems that the demise of Bush, and the participation of Egypt has corrected this situation, which will never forgive history, also has him on the account. Egypt has looked to one side and absent the most important aspects, especially as this is no statute of limitations for crimes. Those seeing a purely legal impact of the humanitarian aspects, national or religious or national security right, enough it is the largest service provided to the Zionist project will pay the price for generations Egypt in subsequent periods. D. Abdullah Ashaal (former ambassador) المصدر: http://العربى
1 2 3 4 5 الفئة: مقالاتي \| أضاف: aboatab712 (2012-10-29) \| الكاتب: YASER E W
مشاهده: 209 \| علامات: YA6 \| الترتيب: 0.0/0